“Writing is
work…”
“Writing
is work but writing the indie book is fun. I write only to please myself. I
don’t have to compromise my creativity to meet anyone else’s expectations. I
write what I like and I laugh all the way to the bank.”
The above
is a composite quote taken from actual internet blog comments. For this
article I am going to assume that everything stated in the above
quotation is true.
Indie
publishing is great for authors. I have indie published myself in the past (and
not just eBooks but also real estate manuals and correspondent courses.) I also intend to publish many Indie eBooks in
the near future. I would truly love to join those who are laughing all the
way to the bank.
This post
is not about authors making money. It is about the cost Indie publishing may
extract on the art of writing. It is about the thinning of the American novel
and where this may lead.
An
Orchestra Where all the Musicians Play to Please Themselves
Imagine a
conductor preparing an 88-piece orchestra to perform a great symphony. The
conductor must make sure that all the sections of the orchestra play the piece
well. If the strings are outstanding but the horns are below standard, the
conductor will work on the horns until they get it right. It is the conductor
who is responsible for the richness of the entire performance. Individual musicians can chaff under the
conductor’s interpretation of the musical piece. Some famous musicians will not
perform with certain conductors. So this is a real issue.
I believe
that the traditional publishing editor is much like the conductor. The
publishing house wants a fully developed story. They want a full orchestral
performance from each title they publish. Every book is part of the publisher’s
total product which is the brand name or name of the line being published. A
complete line of books may be judged by any one of the books within that
line. In short, the publisher wants a full ‘performance’ from each book. It is
the editor’s job to see that that happens.
For
example, after over ten years of reading Love Inspired romances, I have a very
good idea of what I am going to get when I buy my next one. In a sense, I am getting a fully orchestrated
novel.
This
completeness is often not the case with Indie books. Part of the fun of writing indie books (and
only having to please yourself) is not having to do the edits an editor often
requires.
An editor
may send an author, who is happy with her work, three pages of edits. Sometimes
a major character may have to change from being a brother to being a close
friend. Sometimes two characters have to be merged into one. Sometimes up to
20% of the words have to be cut. All this can require major rewrites and months
of extra work. (And authors are not paid for all this extra work. I had one book
where the revisions took just as long to write than the book itself took!)
A Look
at annoying edits
Editors can require
revisions for many reasons: lack of character
development, slow story movement, lack
of physical descriptions, loose ends, dialogue of
characters may sound too much alike, head-hopping, POV changes that can confuse
the reader, too much dialogue, too much telling without compensating facts to
make the story seem real, similar character names that make it hard for readers
to remember who is who, scenes readers really look forward to not being included
because they are too difficult to write or write with any originality, and the
list goes on and on.
The editor
is looking at all the sections of a novel. The performance has to be rich, well
rounded, and up to house standards.
The Joy
of Indie Publishing Is Telling Editors to Shove all their revisions!
The joy of
being an Indie author is just saying no! "I’m not making all those revisions.
This book pleases me just the way it is.
I’m only going to make the revisions I believe are necessary. Besides,
if I don’t waste time on these ‘stylistic’ revisions, I can write more books
and make more money."
The Pizza Problem: the Great Quality Slide
The real
problem here is not that these indie books are bad. Readers may like them just
fine. How will these readers ever know what
is missing? How will they know how much better the stories would have been if enriching
edits had been made? If they don't know what they are missing, they are less likely to miss it.
It’s like
the pizza problem that I’ve witness several times already. A new pizza place
opens and it offers the best pizza many people have ever tasted. The word-of-mouth advertising is fantastic. The place is crowded. Then in a few months, the
quality drops. Those great but expensive ingredients are gone. Average
substitutes take their place and the pizza is now much like everyone else’s.
Average
pizzas are the rule, not the exception. The best ingredients cost a lot more and
besides, many people have never had the real thing. They think the average is very good.
Will
Traditional Writing Become Like Classical Music?
Think of
the conductor we started this post with: suppose when he was having problems
with the percussion section, he just cut them out of the of the orchestra. If
the horns were also giving him trouble, perhaps he just cuts them out as well.
When this conductor is finished he still likes the sound of the ensemble.
Indeed, much of the public may also like the resulting sound.
While the
sound may be very pleasing, it now comes from a thinner orchestra. Of course,
there is really nothing wrong with a four piece chamber music ensemble. Nothing
wrong except it is not an orchestra. The product is different.
So, then,
what’s the problem? The public likes these indie books. The authors may laugh all
the way to the bank. Persnickety editors can be told what they can do with their
revisions. And besides no one is forced to buy or read any of these books anyway. It’s all
harmless and wonderful. Free choice in a free economy.
All this
may be wonderful except the novel is getting thinner. Parts are missing. The
richness is fading. Perhaps a reader won’t notice this at first. Maybe it won’t
be noticed until a reader reads a traditional full-bodied novel right after
reading a thin one. That’s how I’ve been noticing this happen.
I’ve read
well written, typo-free, indie novels where all seemed well except it seemed
something was wrong. Something was missing. I’ve noticed extreme lack of story
movement. Books mostly of dialogue. Characters so vaguely described that I
could form no mental image of what they looked like. Stories that just seem to
end because the word count was reached. Stories with lots of loose ends.
While I
noticed these things, I’m not sure many other readers will. Novels may become like low
grade pizzas. It’s all people know. These pizzas are not bad. They are edible. So
what’s the big deal?
The old
style traditional writing with full ‘orchestral’ richness may become like classical
music is today requiring a special audience which has been educated on how to enjoy its
complexity and beauty.
And yet
some Indie books will undoubtedly be better books than some traditionally
published books. Some indie authors will be just as exacting as professional
editors. A few authors may even be far better editors than those they had to
deal with at publishing houses. But all is not well. There will inevitably be a
thinning of the American novel.
Great perspective, Vince!
ReplyDeleteHi Melissa:
ReplyDeleteThanks for you comment. I downloaded your novella this morning and I see I will have to wait until 1 October for your novel. These are great times for you! I wish you all the best.
Vince
So Vince,
ReplyDeleteDo you think the thinness comes from the fact the writer says "boo to you" at the thought of getting an editor?
OR???
You know I use an editor and frankly I can't imagine putting my "product" out there without her.
My blog, My Story ~ My Way...doesn't mean I will write willy nilly what I want and forget the reader. No sir. The rest of the title is An Indie Adventure...yep, that says it all.
The adventure of being indie published means it is harder for a writer to find that reader...so it means we work harder to find more adventurous ways...both for quality of output and in marketing...
Always love your thoughts of the day.
Hugs
Leslie Ann aka L.A. Sartor
Hi LA:
ReplyDelete“Do you think the thinness comes from the fact the writer says "boo to you" at the thought of getting an editor?”
Not exactly. It can also come from writers who want an editor but want an editor who is working for them. There is little equivalency between a company editor who is working for the publisher and a free lance editor who is working for the writer.
Having an editor with veto power over your publication is a lot more compelling than one who can only make suggestions. One editor I know of has told the writer nine times to redo her 15 page synopsis. Nine rejections. Do you think an indie author paying her own editor would put up with that?
A lot of the thinning will come from authors who have a veto power over their editors. And this happens even to those responsible authors who at least hire editors. What about the many who do not hire editors to clean up their work?
Thinning will happen. I see it happening now with good authors who also publish indie books. But, alas, even thin books can produce a good reading experience.
Perhaps no one (or only a select few) will even notice the change.
Vince